PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS

Authors

  • Alifia Azzahra Salsabila Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Shabrina Areta Cahyani Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Friscellia Rahel Ardesta Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Aulia Khoirunnisa Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Adinda Ririn Setiani Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v3i1.60

Keywords:

Violence, Justice, Disabilities, Abuse

Abstract

The implementation of a system with fair principles for all groups, including persons with disabilities, requires full supervision due to their vulnerability to discrimination as victims, perpetrators, or witnesses. Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities serves as the legal foundation for protecting and respecting the rights of persons with disabilities. However, challenges persist in its practical implementation. A case in Sumenep, as reflected in Decision Number 135/Pid.B/2024/PN.Smp, serves as the main focus of this study, emphasizing the application of justice principles for persons with disabilities who often face obstacles, particularly regarding adequate accommodation and accessibility, leading to injustice in the rights they receive .This research employs a normative juridical method with a case study approach and secondary data analysis to identify the principles of justice applied, assess the implementation of existing regulations, and examine the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The findings indicate that discrimination in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities persists due to weak regulations on the types of disabilities victims face and the accommodations provided. Based on this decision, it is imperative to provide training for law enforcement officers to be more assertive in implementing justice for all citizens of Indonesia, including persons with disabilities, as victims, witnesses, or perpetrators of criminal acts. Strengthening protection mechanisms is essential to ensuring tangible justice and creating an inclusive criminal justice system that safeguards their rights.

References

Ali Sodiqin. (2021). Ambigiusitas Perlindungan Hukum Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.

Anwar, Moh. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Penyandang Disabilitas Dari Kekerasan. Jurnal Jendela Hukum, 5(2), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.24929/fh.v5i2.1434

Arianto, H. (2017). Hak-hak bagi penyandang cacat.

Azali, M. H., & Purba, N. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Aspek Pidana Terhadap Difabel Yang Menjadi Korban Kekerasan Seksual (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Pakam).

Bhayangkara, U., Raya, J., Ismail, Z., Bhayangkara, U., Raya, J., Lestari, M. P., Bhayangkara, U., & Raya, J. (2025). Membangun Kesadaran : Kekerasan Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Dan Solusi Perlindungannya. 2(2), 131–142.

Febrianti Lumban Raja, J., Tamba, N., Sintha Devi, R., Victoria Sinaga, L., & Silaban, R. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Kepada Korban Perempuan Penyandang Disabilitas Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Medan Nomor: 1245/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Mdn) E-Mail.

Handayani, F., & Prasetyo, B. (2025). Analisis Pertimbangan Putusan Pengadilan Pada Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas. Jurnal Inovasi Hukum dan Kebijakan, Volume 6, 212–228.

Indriana, A. A. (2024). Pelayanan Hukum Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Mataram. Jurnal Parhesia, Vol 2, No(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/3021-7555

Kurniawati, D., Parman, L., & Ufran, U. (2022). Perlindungan Hak Korban Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Penuntutan Perkara Pidana. Indonesia Berdaya, 3(4), 1051–1064. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2022347

Luthfia, A. R. (2020). Urgensi Pemberdayaan Penyandang Disabilitas Di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 11(2), 94–100.

Mawaddah, F. H., & Haris, A. (2022). Implementasi Layanan Peradilan Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Perspektif Teori Efektivitas Hukum Soerjono Soekanto. Sakina: Journal of Family Studies, 6(2).

Mifta Rofina Thenu, H., Widi Mulyani, L., & Author, C. (2024). Pemenuhan Hak Korban Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp

Noor Aulia Sari, G., Sinta Dewi Pramudita, W., Muhammad Muhklasin, R., & Sulistianingsih, D. (2024). Tinjauan Filosofis Keadilan Restoratif dalam Lensa Teori Keadilan.

Pijar Cahya Devi, R., Loyola Iswaradatta Prasetio, I., Pijar Cahya, R., & Loyola Iswaradatta, I. (2022). Implementasi Akomodasi Yang Layak Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Proses Penyidikan Di Kepolisian Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52(2), 499–514.

Putri, A., Wiryadi, U., & Nugraha, W. (2024). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 Terkait Pemenuhan Hak Atas Pekerjaan Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Kota Bekasi. 6(September), 1–9.

Rahma, A. F. R. (2024). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK DISABILITAS FISIK AKIBAT PERUNDUNGAN. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian, Vol IV, No, 70–80. https://doi.org/2746-4571

Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM (NORMATIF DAN EMPIRIS) (E. Jaelan, Ed.). WIDINA MEDIA UTAMA.

Rosari, N., Limpulus, M., Mohede, N., & Kuntag, M. (2024). Lex crimen Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Pada Penyandang Disabilitas Ditinjau Dari Hak Asasi Manusia 1. Dalam Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UNSRAT (Vol. 12, Nomor 4). https://sipp.pn-sumenep.go.id/index.php/detil_perkara.

Sari, N. P., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Penyandang Disabilitas sebagai Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(2), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.2.3338.359-364

SIMFONI-PPA. (2024). https://kekerasan.kemenpppa.go.id/ringkasan

SIPP. (2024). https://sipp.pn-sumenep.go.id/index.php/detil_perkara

Tinambunan, H. S. R., & Prasetio, D. E. (2019). Rekonstruksi Konstitusi Dalam Regional Representative Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Terhadap Fungsi Legislatif. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 48(3), 266. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.48.3.2019.266-274

UU Nomor 9 Tahun 2016. (2016).

Downloads

Published

30-04-2025