LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA: BETWEEN EXPECTATION AND REALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v3i2.73Keywords:
Digital oversight, Corruption, Law enforcementAbstract
This study critically examines the effectiveness of law enforcement efforts against corruption in Indonesia, highlighting the persistent gap between legal expectations and practical outcomes. Despite a comprehensive legal framework including Law No. 31/1999, Law No. 20/2001, and the establishment of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Key Alta institutions continue to face political interference, limited resources, legal loopholes, and inconsistent prosecutorial practices. For example, underscore that although asset recovery and conviction rates have risen, sentencing disparities and institutional constraints remain prevalent, impeding deterrence. Complementing this, identifies political coercion and inadequate capacity at enforcement bodies such as the KPK, police, and judiciary as key impediments. This research employs a normative-juridical method, reviewing legislation, judicial rulings, and institutional practices. It also integrates recent Scopus-indexed empirical studies to strengthen its analytical framework. The findings reveal that while recent innovations such as digital oversight in public procurement have improved transparency and stakeholder engagement, they have not yet substantially closed enforcement gaps. The study concludes that sustainable progress requires enhancing institutional independence, ensuring sufficient funding and resources, tightening legal provisions, fostering judicial reform, and embracing innovative approaches such as e‑procurement systems and civil society oversight. These measures are essential to bridging the divide between aspirations and reality in Indonesia's anti‑corruption enforcement mechanisms, thereby meeting both domestic expectations and global standards.
References
Baskoro, A. (2025). Combating corruption in procurement: The synergy of law enforcement, civil society, and digital oversight. Jurnal Pengadaan Indonesia, 4(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.59034/jpi.v4i1.59
Butt, S. (2017). Corruption and law in Indonesia: The weakening of the KPK. Asian Studies Review, 41(2), 234–252.
Calvin, A. (2024). Extraordinary investigation power of the anti-corruption agencies in Indonesia and Singapore. Tumou Tou Law Review, 3(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.35801/tourev.v3i1.52166
Effendi, S. F., Aulia, N., & Faradila, M. (2023). Ambivalensi Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Dalam Konstelasi Hukum Modern di Indonesia. Realism: Law Review, 1(3), 37–55.
Fadillah, S. (2024). Law enforcement against corruption criminal acts in Indonesia from the perspective of legal certainty. ICLESS Proceedings, 2. https://doi.org/https://proceeding.icless.net/index.php/icless22/article/view/89
Hariani, N. J., & Supeno, E. (2024). Digital transformation of Indonesia’s procurement: A catalyst for transparency or a mask for accountability? IAPA Proceedings Conference, 774–789. https://doi.org/https://journal.iapa.or.id/proceedings/article/view/1157
International, T. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023. https://doi.org/https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023
LSI. (2023). prosecuting and preventing criminal acts of corruption. Surya Kencana Tiga, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/sakti/article/view/48762
Pradini, A., & Susanti, E. (n.d.). Analysis of KPK policy on corruption eradication in Indonesia: Internal policy and case data. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 11(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/https://jurnal.unived.ac.id/index.php/jhs/article/view/7637
Reuters. (2025a). Indonesia arrests judges who cleared palm oil companies of graft charges.
Reuters. (2025b). Indonesia arrests Wilmar employee linked to palm oil graft case.
Reuters. (2025c). Indonesia seizes $725 mln from Wilmar Group in palm oil graft case.
Salsabilla, S. S. (2024). Analysis of the effectiveness of law enforcement against corruption crimes. SIJAL, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v1i4.190
Saputra, E., & Chariri, A. (2023). Exposing e-procurement failures in preventing procurement fraud in Indonesia. Jurnal RAK (Riset Akuntansi Keuangan, 8(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.31002/rak.v8i1.880
Suardi, I., Rossieta, H., Diyanty, V., & Djakman, C. (2025). Moderating the effect of procurement governance on corruption through e-procurement. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/1462
Tomagola, A. G., Wirawan, F., & Yuniarti, L. (2024). The effectiveness of Indonesia’s anti-corruption law on legal reform and implementation. West Science Law and Human Rights, 2(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.1129
Umacina, N., & Amsori. (2024). Law enforcement efforts against corruption criminal acts in Indonesia. Postulat Journal, 2(2), 1757. https://doi.org/10.37010/postulat.v2i2.1757
Wikipedia. (2025). Chromebook procurement scandal.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Agus Salim, Suryati Suryati, Ruslan Yusoh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:
- Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
- Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the Realism: Law Review with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.




