Myanmar’s Seat At ASEAN: A Charter-Based Reassessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v4i1.122Keywords:
ASEAN Charter, Five-Point Consensus, suspension mechanism, ASEAN centrality, sovereign equalityAbstract
Five years after the February 2021 state of emergency, ASEAN has shifted from an emergency response toward a sustained restriction of Myanmar’s high-level participation whose legal coherence now warrants scrutiny. This article examines the tension between that practice and the legal architecture of the ASEAN Charter. Adopting a normative juridical method and drawing on primary instruments the ASEAN Charter, the Constitutive Act of the African Union, the Treaty on European Union, and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties it asks whether the restriction is Charter-compatible and whether the Five-Point Consensus has sufficient legal character to ground it. Through comparison with the suspension regimes of the African Union and the European Union, the study finds that the restriction operates outside any formal Charter mechanism and that the Five-Point Consensus, as a non-binding political understanding, cannot supply the missing legal authority. It concludes that ASEAN should relocate its approach within the Charter through Article 48 amendment or authentic interpretation and restore functional engagement, since responsible engagement rather than prolonged exclusion is the more legally coherent course.
References
Acharya, A. (2013). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Acharya, A. (2017). The myth of ASEAN centrality? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(2), 273–279.
Ahmad, A. R. (2016). The ASEAN Charter: An analysis. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 7, 83–94.
African Union. (2000). Constitutive Act of the African Union. Lomé: African Union.
African Union. (2007). African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance. Addis Ababa: African Union.
Aminuddin, M. F., & Purnomo, J. (2017). Redefining ASEAN Way: Assessing normative foundation on inter-governmental relationship in Southeast Asia. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 5(1), 23–36.
ASEAN. (2007). The ASEAN Charter. Singapore: ASEAN Secretariat.
ASEAN. (2021). Five-Point Consensus. Jakarta: ASEAN Leaders’ Meeting.
ASEAN Eminent Persons Group. (2006). Report of the Eminent Persons Group on the ASEAN Charter. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
Aust, A. (2013). Modern treaty law and practice (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bellamy, A. J., & Drummond, C. (2011). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Between non-interference and sovereignty as responsibility. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 179–200.
Bui, H. (2016). The ASEAN human rights system: A critical analysis. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 11(1), 111–140.
Caballero-Anthony, M. (2005). Regional security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN way. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
Chesterman, S. (2008). Does ASEAN exist? The Association of Southeast Asian Nations as an international legal person. Singapore Year Book of International Law, 12, 199–211.
Crawford, J. (2006). The creation of states in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drajat, G. M. (2022). ASEAN’s socialization of Myanmar: Perilous ambivalence, the 2021 coup and the way forward. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 44(3), 453–481.
European Union. (2012). Treaty on European Union (Consolidated version). Official Journal of the European Union, C 326.
Gunawan, T. (2024). Between principles and actions: ASEAN and Indonesia in dealing with the political crisis in Myanmar. Jurnal Global & Strategis, 18(1), 81–106.
Haacke, J. (2025). Reassessing ASEAN’s Five-Point Consensus: On shifting boundaries of legitimate involvement and a contested consensus. Asian Politics & Policy, 17(4), Article e70050.
International Court of Justice. (1986). Military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits. The Hague: ICJ Reports.
International Crisis Group. (2022). Myanmar’s coup shakes up its ethnic conflicts (Asia Report No. 319). Brussels: International Crisis Group.
International Crisis Group. (2025). Myanmar’s dangerous drift: Conflict, elections and looming regional détente (Briefing No. 184). Brussels: International Crisis Group.
International Law Commission. (2011). Draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations, with commentaries (UN Doc. A/66/10). New York: United Nations.
Jennings, R., & Watts, A. (Eds.). (1992). Oppenheim’s international law (9th ed., Vol. 1). London: Longman.
Jones, L. (2010). Still in the “drivers’ seat”, but for how long? ASEAN’s capacity for leadership in East-Asian international relations. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(3), 95–113.
Jones, L. (2012). ASEAN, sovereignty and intervention in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kharisma, M. W., & Widyautami, A. A. (2024). The role of the Special Envoy of the ASEAN Chair on Myanmar (2021–2024). Indonesian Quarterly, 52(4), 313–336.
Klabbers, J. (1996). The concept of treaty in international law. The Hague: Kluwer.
Koh, T., Manalo, R. G., & Woon, W. (Eds.). (2009). The making of the ASEAN Charter. Singapore: World Scientific.
Lall, M. (2016). Understanding reform in Myanmar: People and society in the wake of military rule. London: Hurst.
Mahaseth, H., & Subramaniam, K. (2021). Binding or non-binding: Analysing the nature of the ASEAN agreements. International and Comparative Law Review, 21(1), 100–123.
Qiao-Franco, G., Karmazin, A., & Kolmaš, M. (2025). The Indo-Pacific and the next phase of ASEAN centrality. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 44(3), 413–435.
Sadurski, W. (2019). Poland’s constitutional breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schachter, O. (1977). The twilight existence of nonbinding international agreements. American Journal of International Law, 71(2), 296–304.
Severino, R. C. (2006). Southeast Asia in search of an ASEAN community: Insights from the former ASEAN Secretary-General. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
Tan, H.-L. (2011). The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: Institutionalising human rights in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. San Francisco: United Nations.
United Nations. (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Vienna: United Nations.
United Nations General Assembly. (2021). The situation in Myanmar (Resolution 75/287, A/RES/75/287, 18 June 2021). New York: United Nations.
United Nations Security Council. (2022). Resolution 2669 (2022) on the situation in Myanmar (S/RES/2669, 21 December 2022). New York: United Nations.
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2024). Myanmar humanitarian needs and response plan 2025. Geneva: OCHA.
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2025). Myanmar humanitarian update No. 50. Geneva: OCHA.
White, N. D. (2016). The law of international organisations (3rd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Woon, W. (2016). The ASEAN Charter: A commentary. Singapore: NUS Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hla Myet Chell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:
- Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
- Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the Realism: Law Review with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.
