Social Pathology, The State, and Power: A Sociological Analysis of Community Organisation Thuggery from the Perspective of Michel Foucault

Authors

  • Asmoro Aji Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v4i2.145

Keywords:

Community Organisations, Governmentality, Organised Thuggery, Power/Knowledge, Foucauldian Discourse Analysis

Abstract

This study examines the changing role of community organisations in Indonesia, where their rapid growth has been accompanied by affiliations with organised thuggery. Drawing on Michel Foucault's poststructuralist perspective, organised thuggery is understood not as an objective social pathology but as a discursive construct produced through power/knowledge relations. This study explores how the state constructs community organisations affiliated with organised thuggery as objects of security intervention through governmentality. Using a qualitative approach, the research applies Foucauldian Discourse Analysis (FDA) to analyse state regulations, government policy documents, and police telegrams issued between 2024 and 2026. The findings show that the state establishes a regime of truth by classifying community organisations into "normal" and "deviant" categories, framing intimidation, extortion, and violence as threats to public order and the investment climate. This strategy is institutionalised through the Integrated Task Force established under the Coordinating Minister for Political and Security Affairs Decree No. 61 of 2025, integrating cross-sectoral coordination, administrative oversight, law enforcement, and organisational guidance. The study concludes that controlling organised thuggery relies not only on repression but also on administrative knowledge that legitimises state intervention and normalises organisational behaviour to maintain security, public order, and a sustainable investment climate

References

Aini, H., & Putra, E. V. (2026). Wacana, pengetahuan, dan kuasa dalam debat Pilkada 2024 di Pesisir Selatan berdasarkan perspektif Foucault. Perspektif: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi dan Pendidikan, 9(1), 99–110

Andriani, I. (2024). Analisis wacana kritis model Foucault dalam berita “Tangis Goenawan Mohamad dan ambisi kekuasaan Jokowi” pada Kompas.com. Jurnal Sitasi Ilmiah, 2(1), 40–49.

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Pemilihan umum, klientelisme, dan negara di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Effendi, T., Perwira, H. T. Y., Siahaan, P. M., Niswah, L. U. K., & Lestari, A. S. I. (2024). Pendekatan sosial terhadap kejahatan. Scopindo Media Pustaka.

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. LKiS.

Foucault, Michel. (2002). Power/Knowledge: Wacana Kuasa/Pengetahuan, Diterjemahkan oleh Yudi Santoso. Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. University of Chicago Press.

Gatot Eddy Pramono. (2015). Transfcommunity organisations i Organisasi Kemasyarakatan (Ormas ) menjadi Kelompok Kekerasan (Studi Kekerasan Community organisations di Jakarta). Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 1(2)

Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford University Press.

Hasibuan, A. A. (2021). Buku ajar patologi sosial. Kencana.

Irdiansyah, A. R. (2021). Reproduksi pengetahuan untuk kekuasaan: Analisis wacana kritis pada artikel ilmiah dan pidato Megawati Soekarnoputri. Perspektif Komunikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik dan Komunikasi Bisnis, 5(2), 223–237.

Kartini,Kartono. (2013). Patologi Sosial Jilid 1. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Keputusan Menteri Koordinator Bidang Politik dan Keamanan Nomor 61 Tahun 2025 tentang Satuan Tugas Terpadu Penanganan dan Pembinaan Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Terafiliasi Kegiatan Premanisme yang Mengganggu Stabilitas Keamanan dan Ketertiban Masyarakat serta Iklim Investasi.

Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.

Pratama, R. A. (2021). Kekuasaan, pengetahuan, dan hegemoni bahasa dalam perspektif Michel Foucault dan Francis Bacon. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(1), 33–43.

Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.

Seputra, H. R., & Suyatno, S. (2024). Kekuasaan sebagai dasar legitimasi hukum dalam pemikiran filsafat hukum. AL-MIKRAJ: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, 5(1), 1206–1217.

Siregar, M. (2021). Kritik terhadap Teori Kekuasaan-Pengetahuan Foucault. Juispol, 1-12.

Soekanto, S. (2005). Sosiologi suatu pengantar. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Wilson, Ian Douglas. (2018). Politik Jatah Preman: Ormas dan Kuasa Jalanan di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru (Terjemahan: Mirza Jaka Suryana). Tangerang Selatan: Marjin Kiri.

Downloads

Published

08-08-2026

How to Cite

Aji, A. (2026). Social Pathology, The State, and Power: A Sociological Analysis of Community Organisation Thuggery from the Perspective of Michel Foucault. Realism: Law Review, 4(2), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v4i2.145