THE ISRAELI PRODUCT BOYCOTT MOVEMENT IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v3i2.67Keywords:
israeli product, Boycott movement, consumer protectionAbstract
The boycott of Israeli products in Indonesia reflects both solidarity with Palestine and the exercise of consumer rights. This study aims to analyze the boycott movement from the perspective of Indonesian consumer protection law, particularly Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK). Using a normative juridical method with a statute and conceptual approach, the research examines how consumer rights are exercised in ethical consumption practices and how legal obligations are imposed on businesses. The findings indicate that boycotts can be regarded as part of consumers’ rights to make choices based on moral and ethical considerations, although legal and economic challenges may arise. Businesses are required to provide accurate product information, while unclear labeling often hinders consumer decision-making. The study also discusses the legal and economic implications of boycotts in the context of international trade, underscoring the importance of regulatory frameworks that ensure transparency and strengthen consumer protection when ethical dilemmas shape purchasing decisions
References
Centre, A. H. R. (2024). The Economic Impacts of Boycotts Against Israel and Supporting Companies. Accessed October, 10.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2007). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
Fisia. (2024). Boikot Produk Pro-Israel: Perspektif Etika dan Politik. KOMPASIANA.
Friedman, M. (1985). Consumer Boycotts in the United States. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 19(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1985.tb00346.x.
Indonesia, C. N. B. C. (2023). Tak Ada Hubungan Diplomatik, Kok Bisa RI-Israel Berdagang?
Kementerian Perdagangan, R. I. (2023). Marak Seruan Boikot Produk Pro Israel, Begini Respons Mendag. November, 10.
Khotimah, C. A., & Chairunnisa, J. C. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online (E-Commerce. BUSINESS LAW REVIEW, 1.
KOMPAS. (2020). Konsep Perlindungan Konsumen. KOMPAS.Com.
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2014). Principles of Marketing. Pearson.
Marzuki, P. M. (2019). PENELITIAN HUKUM. Edisi Revisi. Prenadamedia Grup.
Movement, B. D. S. (2016). What Is BDS?
Organization, W. T. (2024). Understanding the WTO - The Agreements.
Sabar, H., Tinambunan, R., Indar, F., & Kusuma, S. (2025). Legal Protection Policy for the People in Handling COVID- 19 : A Comparison of Indonesia and Australia. Realism: Law Review, 3(1), 31–43.
Schwartz, M. (2001). The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 247–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010787607771.
Solomon, M. R. (2017). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being. Pearson.
Sukarna, K. (2018). Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Konsumen dan Pelaku Usaha (Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v6i1.851.
Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. (n.d.).
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Report : Consumer Protection, Competition, and Human Rights. (2006). United Nations Publications.
Wikipedia. (2024). ASEAN Free Trade Area. In Wikipedia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ria Setyawati, Indira Retno Aryatie, Nasarudin bin Abdul Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:
- Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
- Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the Realism: Law Review with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.
