Privacy Protection Against Forced Wirebreaking Attempt by Law Enforcement Officials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v3i3.99Keywords:
Wiretapping, Authority, Human RightsAbstract
The law permits coercive measures in law enforcement, one of which is telephone tapping. Initially, telephone tapping was closely linked to the protection of privacy as a human right; however, such protection can be limited when necessary and is regulated by law. In Indonesia, regulations governing telephone tapping remain fragmented, as several law enforcement agencies authorized to conduct telephone tapping regulate the mechanism independently through different legal frameworks. This situation has the potential to create legal uncertainty and raise concerns about the protection of citizens' privacy rights. This study uses normative legal research with a legal and conceptual approach. This study aims to analyze the authority of several state institutions to conduct telephone tapping and to examine the mechanisms governing telephone tapping to ensure the protection of the right to privacy as a human right in the law enforcement process
References
Ali, Z. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Amanda Putri, N. G., Dea Avita, F., & Vindi Putri, H. J. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konteks Hukum. Indonesian Journal Of Legality Of Law, 1(2), 1–13.
Bawengan, G. W., Interogasi, P. P. P. D. T., Ketiga, C., Paramita, P., & Jakarta. (1989). Penyidikan Perkara Pidana Dan Teknik Interogasi (Cetakan Ke). Pradnya Paramita.
Bryandono, & Beny. (2021). Legalitas Penyadapan Oleh Jaksa Dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Pidana & Krimonologi, 3(1).
Cindropole, A. C., & Rosmini, S. (2024). The Legal And Ethical Implications Of Surveillance In Criminal Law: A Literatur Review. EScience Humanity Journal, 4(1), 452.
Dalimunthe, A. P. (2024). Legalitas Praktik Metode Penyadapan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Ketentuan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), 83.
Dewi, S. (2018). Privacy: An Overview of Indonesia Statutes Governing Lawful Interception. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 12(4), 586–597.
Djurian, J. D. et. a. (2025). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Penegakan Hukum Sebagai Perwujudan Hak Asasi Manusia (Vol. 13, Issue 3).
Elsam. (2025). Kejaksaan Agung Teken MoU Penyadapan dengan Operator Telekomunikasi, Privasi Warga Dikorbankan atas Nama Penegakan Hukum.
Garner, B. A. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary, St. Paull Thomson.
Hale, A., & Edwards, J. (2006). Getting Its Taped. Computer and Communications Law Review.
Hamzah, A., Indonesia, H. A. P., Revisi, E., Grafika, S., & Jakarta. (2001). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Edisi Revi). Sinar Grafika.
Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan, Istislam, Hadiyantina, S., Kusumaningrum, A., & Tajudin, A. A. (2025). Recentralization of Mining Licensing Authority and Its Impact on Local Autonomy in Indonesia. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 7(2), 533.
Hosein, G., & Palwo, C. W. (2013). Modern Safeguards For Moders Surveillance: An Analysis of Innovations in Communications Surveillance Techniques". Ohio State Law Journal, 76(6).
Kaligis, O. C. (2001). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Asasi Tersangka, Terdakwa dan Terpidana.
Koyongian, R. R. (2021). Penyadapan Oleh Penyidik Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi". Lex Privatum, 9(8).
Laia, F. (2020). Penyadapan Yang Dilakukan KPK Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia". Jurnal Education and Development, 8(3).
Laurencia, T. (2019). Penyadapan Oleh KPK Dalam Perspektif Due Proess of Law". Jurnal Mercatoria, 12(2).
Manthovani, R. (2015). Penyadapan vs Privasi, Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Marzuki, P. M. (2019). PENELITIAN HUKUM. Edisi Revisi. Prenadamedia Grup.
Marzuki, S. (2017). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Pusham UII.
O’Connor, J., & McDermott, I. (1997). The Art of Systems Thinking, Essential Skills for Creativity and Problem Solving, Thorson.
Paripurna, A., Purwoleksono, D. E., Korupsi, M. K. P. B. H. A. M. D. P. T. P., & Anggaran, L. H. P. H. B. T. (2012). No Title. Universitas Airlangga.
Pratama, W. A., & Yuliani, A. N. (2024). Hukuman Mati Bagi Bandar Narkotika Dalam Persfektif Hukum dan Ham. Realism: Law Review, 2(3), 200–218.
Putri, E. A., Rahayu, S., & Lasmadi, S. (2025). Tindakan Lawful Interception oleh Penyidik dalam Penegakan Hukum. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 6(3), 329.
Rachmad, A. (2016). Legalitas Penyadapan Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia". Jurnal Hukum Samudera Keadilan, 11(2).
Reza, M. H. M., & Kamila, S. (2025). Chemical Castration Punishment: an International Human Rights Law Perspective. Realism: Law Review, 3(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v3i1.54
Sabar, H., Tinambunan, R., Istislam, Hadiyantina, S., Kusumaningrum, A., & Nte, N. D. (2025). Governance of Mineral and Coal Mining Permits : Legal Dynamics in Indonesia and Nigeria. Diponegoro Law Review, 10(2), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.234-253
Salim, H., Kurnia, M., & Azhari, N. D. (n.d.). Analisis Keabsahan Penyadapan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Tanpa Izin Pengadilan". ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 9(2).
Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Press.
Suntoro, A. (2020). Penyadapan dan Eksistensi Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(1).
Tinambunan, H. S. R., Kusuma, F. I. S., Permatasari, V. A., Sugiarto, A. F., & Tajudin, A. A. (2025). Legal Protection Policy for the People in Handling Covid-19: A Comparison of Indonesia and Australia. Realism: Law Review, 3(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.71250/rlr.v3i1.55
UDHR. (1948). Article 12 Universal Declaration of Human Right (UDHR) 1948.
Watch, I. C. (2009). Penyadapan dalam Hukum Pidana.
Widodo, S., Napitupulu, E. A. T., & KUHAP, K. A. P. P. D. R. (2013). Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.
Yuvens, D. A. (2017). Dilema Upaya Hukum Terhadap Penyadapan". Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(3).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bagus Oktafian Abrianto, Dharma Setiawan Negara, Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan, Vivi Ayudya Permatasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) who wish to publish with this journal should agree to the following terms:
- Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
- Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publish and distribute the Article with the copyright notice to the Realism: Law Review with the article license CC-BY-NC 4.0.
